Inertia and Grid Stability


The UK Black-outs on 9th August 2019 could have been prevented with inertia.

Friday 9th August the UK experienced mass blackouts. Electricity supplies from one wind farm (Hornsea One, 750MW) and one generator set of one gas-fired power station (Little Barford, Cambridgeshire) failed almost simultaneously at 16:54. There was then a cascade of further trips within Little Barford, taking out the entire power station (680MW). The total capacity loss was ~1,430MW at the beginning of the evening peak. While National Grid’s power was restored by 18:00, disruption continued throughout the evening on the transport networks. 16:54 is in Settlement Period 33; 18:00 is the end of Settlement Period 36. While batteries and DSR offer many useful grid services, shortfalls in their ability to
provide sufficient grid resilience include:

  • Inadequate scale: typical battery and DSR installations are around 1-20MW while the system need was 1.43GW;
  • Inadequate duration: the outage was longer than the duration of most battery and DSR services;
  • Battery state of charge: National Grid’s plans appear to assume that batteries are always kept fully charged, whereas in reality they are all cycling in charge state according to their contracts and commercial optimisation;
  • Battery and DSR activation times: even if perfectly available, the fact that batteries and DSR (and gas reciprocating engine plants) need to be activated actively imposes delays in response of a few seconds, during which delays the system fails, whereas inertial systems are an always-on response;
  • DSR response times: DSR resources need to be polled, signal availability, and then receive and respond to an activation signal, which increases their response times still further.

Inertia


What is really needed is real inertia. The true story of August 9th is that there is less inertia on the system than there has been since the construction of the grid. This is due to the retirement of fossil fuelled power stations. That day, inertia was low because wind generation was high. Had there been sufficient inertia, only one or two trips would have occurred, not a cascade of many. Storelectric’s CAES solutions provide twice the natural inertia of an equivalent-sized power station, and provide it 24/7.

Originally written in 2019.

SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES

READ MORE

GET IN TOUCH